族谱网 头条 人物百科

叶尼塞语系

2020-10-16
出处:族谱网
作者:阿族小谱
浏览:2568
转发:0
评论:0
分类支系包括7种语言:愒语(Ket)(ket)鹆语(Yugh)†(yuu)秳语(Kott)†(zko)阿林语(Arin)†(xrn)阿桑语(Assan)†(xss)旁普科尔语(Pumpokol)†(xpm)尤卡吉尔语系(Yug)†(yug)其中的Yug、Pumpokol、Arin和Assan早在18世纪消亡了,我们对这些语言所知甚微。秳语在19世纪末消失了,但是芬兰语言学家Castrén发表了详细的语法和词典。鹆语在1960年代绝种,俄国学者Werner对这种语言进行了深入的研究,发表了词典、语法和传统故事。如今只有愒语还在使用中,约有1000个左右的老人懂这种语言。一些学者认为,中国古代的匈奴、羯等民族和使用叶尼塞语系语言的民族有同源关系。除此之外,其他学者提出过大胆的假设,认为叶尼塞语系和汉藏语系同源,为汉-高加索语系一支。另外亦有建议叶尼塞语系可与纳-达内语系合并成为达内-叶尼塞语系...

分类支系

包括7种语言:

愒语(Ket)( ket )

鹆语(Yugh)† ( yuu )

秳语(Kott)† ( zko )

阿林语(Arin) † ( xrn )

阿桑语(Assan) † ( xss )

旁普科尔语(Pumpokol) † ( xpm )

尤卡吉尔语系(Yug) † ( yug )

其中的Yug、Pumpokol、Arin和Assan早在18世纪消亡了,我们对这些语言所知甚微。秳语在19世纪末消失了,但是芬兰语言学家Castrén发表了详细的语法和词典。鹆语在1960年代绝种,俄国学者Werner对这种语言进行了深入的研究,发表了词典、语法和传统故事。如今只有愒语还在使用中,约有1000个左右的老人懂这种语言。

一些学者认为,中国古代的匈奴、羯等民族和使用叶尼塞语系语言的民族有同源关系。除此之外,其他学者提出过大胆的假设,认为叶尼塞语系和汉藏语系同源,为汉-高加索语系一支。另外亦有建议叶尼塞语系可与纳-达内语系合并成为达内-叶尼塞语系或提纳-高加索语系。

叶尼塞语言的形态变化特别复杂,有前缀、后缀、中缀、元音交替等构词手段。

 

参考文献

ANDERSON, G. (2003) "Yeniseic languages in Siberian areal perspective", Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 56.1/2: 12–39. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

ANONYMOUS. (1925). The Similarity of Chinese and Indian Languages. Science Supplement 62 (1607): xii. [Usually incorrectly cited as "Sapir (1925)": see Kaye (1992), Bengtson (1994).]

BENGTSON, John D. (1994). Edward Sapir and the "Sino-Dené" Hypothesis. Anthropological Science 102.3: 207-230.

BENGTSON, John D. (1998). Caucasian and Sino-Tibetan: A Hypothesis of S. A. Starostin. General Linguistics, Vol. 36, no. 1/2, 1998 (1996). Pegasus Press, University of North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina.

BENGTSON, John D. (1998). Some Yenisseian Isoglosses. Mother tongue IV, 1998.

BENGTSON, J.D. (2008).Materials for a Comparative Grammar of the Dene-Caucasian (Sino-Caucasian) Languages.In Aspects of Comparative Linguistics, v. 3., pp. 45-118. Moscow: RSUH Publishers.

BLAŽEK, Václav, and John D. BENGTSON. 1995. "Lexica Dene-Caucasica." Central Asiatic Journal 39.1: 11-50, 39.2: 161-164.

BLEICHSTEINER, Robert. (1930). "Die werschikisch-burischkische Sprache im Pamirgebiet und ihre Stellung zu den Japhetitensprachen des Kaukasus [The Werchikwar-Burushaski language in the Pamir region and its position relative to the Japhetic languages of the Caucasus]." Wiener Beiträge zur Kunde des Morgenlandes 1: 289-331.

BOUDA, Karl. (1936). Jenisseisch-tibetische Wortgleichungen [Yeniseian-Tibetan word equivalents]. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90: 149-159.

BOUDA, Karl. (1957). Die Sprache der Jenissejer. Genealogische und morphologische Untersuchungen [The language of the Yeniseians. Genealogical and morphological investigations]. Anthropos 52.1-2: 65-134.

DONNER, Kai. (1930). Über die Jenissei-Ostiaken und ihre Sprache [About the Yenisei ostyaks and their language]. Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne 44.

VAN DRIEM, George. (2001). The Languages of the Himalayas. Leiden: Brill.

(DULSON, A.P.) Дульзон, А.П. (1968). Кетский язык [The Ket language]. Томск: Издательство Томского Университета [Tomsk: Tomsk University Press].

DYBO, Anna V., STAROSTIN G. S. (2008).In Defense of the Comparative Method, or the End of the Vovin Controversy.// Originally in: Aspects of Comparative Linguistics, v. 3. Moscow: RSUH Publishers, pp. 109-258.

GEORG, Stefan. (2007).A Descriptive Grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak), Volume I: Introduction, Phonology, Morphology , Folkestone/Kent: Global Oriental. ISBN 1-901903-58-3; ISBN 978-1-901903-58-4

GREENBERG, J.H., and M. Ruhlen. (1992).Linguistic Origins of Native Americans.Scientific American 267.5 (November): 94–99.

GREENBERG, J.H., and M. Ruhlen. (1997). L"origine linguistique des Amérindiens[The linguistic origin of the Amerindians]. Pour la Science (Dossier, October), 84–89.

KAYE, A.S. (1992). Distant genetic relationship and Edward Sapir. Semiotica 91.3/4: 273-300.

NIKOLA(Y)EV, Sergei L. (1991). Sino-Caucasian Languages in America. In Shevoroshkin (1991): 42-66.

PULLEYBLANK, Edwin G. (2002). Central Asia and Non-Chinese Peoples of Ancient China (Collected Studies, 731).

RESHETNIKOV, Kirill Yuriy; STAROSTIN, George S. (1995).The Structure of the Ket Verbal Form.// Originally in: The Ket Volume (Studia Ketica), v. 4. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, pp. 7-121.

RESHETNIKOV, Yuriy Kirill; STAROSTIN, George S. (1995).Morphology of the Kott Verb and Reconstruction of the Proto-Yeniseian Verbal System.// Originally in: The Ket Volume (Studia Ketica), v. 4. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, pp. 122-175.

RUHLEN, M. (1997). Une nouvelle famille de langues: le déné-caucasien [A new language family: Dene-Caucasian]. Pour la Science (Dossier, October) 68–73.

RUHLEN, Merritt. (1998a). Dene-Caucasian: A New Linguistic Family. In The Origins and Past of Modern Humans – Towards Reconciliation, ed. by Keiichi Omoto and Phillip V. Tobias, Singapore, World Scientific, 231–46.

RUHLEN, Merritt. (1998b).The Origin of the Na-Dene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 13994–96.

RUBICZ, R., MELVIN, K.L., CRAWFORD, M.H. 2002. Genetic Evidence for the phylogenetic relationship between Na-Dene and Yeniseian speakers. Human Biology , Dec 1 2002 74 (6) 743-761

SAPIR, Edward. (1920). Comparative Sino-Tibetan and Na-Dené Dictionary. Ms. Ledger. American Philosophical Society Na 20a.3. (Microfilm)

SHAFER, Robert. (1952). Athapaskan and Sino-Tibetan. International Journal of American Linguistics 18: 12-19.

SHAFER, Robert. (1957). Note on Athapaskan and Sino-Tibetan. International Journal of American Linguistics 23: 116-117.

STACHOWSKI, Marek (1996). Über einige altaische Lehnwörter in den Jenissej-Sprachen. In Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 1: 91-115.

STACHOWSKI, Marek (1997). Altaistische Anmerkungen zum “Vergleichenden Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen”. In Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2: 227-239.

STACHOWSKI, Marek (2004). Anmerkungen zu einem neuen vergleichenden Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. In Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 9: 189-204.

STACHOWSKI, Marek (2006a). Arabische Lehnwörter in den Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts und die Frage der Sprachbünde in Sibirien. In Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 123 (2006): 155-158.

STACHOWSKI, Marek (2006b). Persian loan words in 18th century Yeniseic and the problem of linguistic areas in Siberia. In A. Krasnowolska / K. Maciuszak / B. Mękarska (ed.): In the Orient where the Gracious Light... [Festschrift for A. Pisowicz], Kraków: 179-184.

(STAROSTIN, Sergei A.) Старостин, Сергей А. (1982).Праенисейская реконструкция и внешние связи енисейских языков[A Proto-Yeniseian reconstruction and the external relations of the Yeniseian languages]. In: Кетский сборник, ed. Е.А. Алексеенко (E.A. Alekseenko). Leningrad: Nauka, 44-237.

(STAROSTIN, Sergei A.) Старостин, Сергей А. (1984). Гипотеза о генетических связях сино-тибетских языков с енисейскими и северокавказскими языками [A hypothesis on genetic relations of the Sino-Tibetan languages to the Yeniseian and the North Caucasian languages]. In: Лингвистическая реконструкция и древнейшая история Востока [Linguistic reconstruction and the prehistory of the East], 4: Древнейшая языковая ситуация в восточной Азии [The prehistoric language situation in eastern Asia], ed. И. Ф. Вардуль (I.F. Varduľ) et al. Москва: Институт востоковедения [Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 19-38. [see Starostin 1991]

STAROSTIN, Sergei A. (1991). On the Hypothesis of a Genetic Connection Between the Sino-Tibetan Languages and the Yeniseian and North Caucasian Languages. In Shevoroshkin (1991): 12-41. [Translation of Starostin 1984]

STAROSTIN, Sergei A., and Merritt RUHLEN. (1994). Proto-Yeniseian Reconstructions, with Extra-Yeniseian Comparisons. In M. Ruhlen, On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 70-92. [Partial translation of Starostin 1982, with additional comparisons by Ruhlen.]

TAILLEUR, O.G. (1994). Traits paléo-eurasiens de la morphologie iénisséienne. Études finno-ougriennes 26: 35-56.

TAILLEUR, O.G. (1958). Un îlot basco-caucasien en Sibérie: les langues iénisséiennes [A little Basque-Caucasian island in Siberia: the Yeniseian languages]. Orbis 7.2: 415-427.

TOPOROV, V.N. (1971). Burushaski and Yeniseian Languages: Some Parallels. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 4: 107-125.

VAJDA, Edward J. (1998). The Kets and Their Language. Mother Tongue IV.

VAJDA, Edward J. (2000). Ket Prosodic Phonology. Munich: Lincom Europa Languages of the World vol. 15.

VAJDA, Edward J. (2002). The Origin of Phonemic Tone in Yeniseic. In CLS 37, 2002. (Parasession on Arctic languages: 305-320).

VAJDA, Edward J. (2004). Ket. Lincom Europa, München.

VAJDA, Edward J. (2004). Languages and Prehistory of Central Siberia. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 262. John Benjamin Publishing Company. (Presentation of the Yeniseian family and its speakers, together with neighboring languages and their speakers, in linguistic, historical and archeological view)

VAJDA, Edward J. (2007). Yeniseic substrates and typological accommodation in central Siberia.

VAJDA, Edward J. (2008a). "Yeniseic" (a chapter in the book Language isolates and microfamilies of Asia , Routledge, to be co-authored with Bernard Comrie; 53 pages).

VAJDA, Edward J. (2008b). A Siberian Link with Na-Dene Languages (PDF). Dene-Yeniseic Symposium, Fairbanks.

VOVIN, Alexander. (2000). "Did the Xiong-nu speak a Yeniseian language?" Central Asiatic Journal 44.1: 87–104.

VOVIN, Alexander. (2002). "Did the Xiongnu speak a Yeniseian language? Part 2: Vocabulary", in Altaica Budapestinensia MMII, Proceedings of the 45th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, Budapest, June 23-28, pp. 389-394.

WERNER, Heinrich. (1998). Reconstructing Proto-Yenisseian. Mother Tongue IV.

WERNER, Heinrich. (2004). Zur jenissejisch-indianischen Urverwandtschaft [On the Yeniseian-[American] Indian primordial relationship]. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.


免责声明:以上内容版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。感谢每一位辛勤著写的作者,感谢每一位的分享。

——— 没有了 ———
编辑:阿族小谱

更多文章

更多精彩文章
评论 {{commentTotal}} 文明上网理性发言,请遵守《新闻评论服务协议》
游客
发表评论
  • {{item.userName}} 举报

    {{item.content}}

    {{item.time}} {{item.replyListShow ? '收起' : '展开'}}评论 {{curReplyId == item.id ? '取消回复' : '回复'}}

    回复评论
加载更多评论
打赏作者
“感谢您的打赏,我会更努力的创作”
— 请选择您要打赏的金额 —
{{item.label}}
{{item.label}}
打赏成功!
“感谢您的打赏,我会更努力的创作”
返回
打赏
私信

推荐阅读

· 叶尼塞河
正源叶尼塞河由两条河流取其源头:波塞尔河及马尼尔河。这两条河流在克孜勒聚合。叶尼塞河由西沙也群山以约七百公里的长度流过一片草原直到处于美那也的大水坝。贝加尔河源克拉斯诺亚尔斯克附近的叶尼塞河上安加拉河流入贝加尔湖北部,处于布里亚特共和国。但它最大的源头在色楞格河形成东南面的三角洲。它另一支流土拉河经过乌兰巴托,而Egiin支流流到库苏古尔湖。由马尔拉下游两百多公里的萨扬-舒申斯克水电站(Sayano-Shushenskaya)大坝推动俄罗斯1989建成的最大的6400MW水力发电厂。约一百公里下游的阿巴坎河流经阿巴坎,是哈卡斯共和国的首都,邻近鄂毕河Chulym的支流直达三百公里后的克拉斯诺亚尔斯克,也是西伯利亚铁路及叶尼塞河的最大城市。近著的克拉斯诺亚尔斯克港有克拉斯诺亚尔斯克水电站。热列兹诺戈尔斯克的保密行政区是在七十公里下游,可能是核工业区,有可能是叶尼塞河核污染的源头。再两百公里下...
· 尼罗-撒哈拉语系
外部链接LanguageFamilyIndex
· 叶尼塞吉尔吉斯人
历史叶尼塞吉尔吉斯人最早出现在汉代叫鬲昆、坚昆,南北朝至唐代叫结骨、黠戛斯,他们与铁勒不同,他们一直生活在原地直到打败回纥建国,《唐会要》说他们黑发者为李陵苗裔与唐朝同宗,李陵曾被匈奴单于封为“右校王”与“丁灵王”卫律平起平坐。盖嘉运的《西域记》也说他们出售一种叫迦沙的陨铁给突厥。唐代曾经在该地置坚昆都督府属于燕然都护府,同时他们的统治者名阿热,自称出自李陵。一些唐代史籍把黑发者于李陵联系上,一些唐代史籍如《通典》则没有。他们在打败回鹘汗国后建国,但没离原地。他们后来成为投降成吉思汗的林木中姓,被并入蒙古帝国的谦谦州与益兰州。与塔施提克文化的关系他们一般被认为与塔施提克文化有关。这文化在公元前四世纪出现,在萨彦岭一带有他们遗迹。有数目庞大的器皿、饰品、皮帽、武器、丝绸与鞋,还有大量面具。这些面具有白种人特征也有黄种人特征。塔斯提克文化多数是原欧洲人,也有与突厥语族,伊朗人及吐火罗混血。生活
· 尼日尔-刚果语系
分类西方的语言分类尼日尔-刚果语系诸语根据西方的语言分类,大致上分成:大西洋-刚果语族、科尔多凡语族、曼德语族三个语族。不过这种分类,却使大多数语言都被归类到庞大的“大西洋-刚果语族”里(而且这语族的大多数语言都是班图语),余下少量的语言分属科尔多凡语族及曼德语族。下表括号内为该语族或语支所包含的语言数。大西洋-刚果语族(Atlantic-Congo)(1418)科尔多凡语族Kordofanian(24)曼德语族(Mande)(71)未分类的尼日尔-刚果语言(1)这个分类法,把大约一半尼日尔-刚果语系语言都归入了“尼日尔-刚果语系”,“大西洋-刚果语族”,“沃尔特-刚果语支”,“贝努埃-刚果亚语支”,“类班图下语支”之中。中国图书馆分类法在中国图书馆分类法的分类中,尼日尔-刚果语系的分类比较阔,可分成以下各个语族:西大西洋语支(H816)曼得语支(H817)克瓦语支(H818)古尔语支(H...
· 赖安·塞塞尼翁
俱乐部生涯富勒姆2016年8月9日,塞塞尼翁首次代表富勒姆于英格兰联赛杯对战莱顿东方。生涯统计最后更新:2016年8月9日外部链接

关于我们

关注族谱网 微信公众号,每日及时查看相关推荐,订阅互动等。

APP下载

下载族谱APP 微信公众号,每日及时查看
扫一扫添加客服微信